L’effettività dei diritti alla luce della giurisprudenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo di Strasburgo | Articoli su sentenze e provvedimenti della CEDU

Logo Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio

Taggato: Diritto al rispetto della vita privata e familiare

Vita privata e familiare | Private and family life

VANNUCCINI S. – Gli effetti dello scenario emergenziale SARS-CoV-2 sulle condizioni di vita dei minori di età: evidenze di una overview

Autore dell’articolo/Author
Sabrina Vannuccini

Abstract

Una ragionata panoramica,  basata su un approccio strutturato alla ricerca nella letteratura empirica, delle conseguenze  sulle condizioni di vita dei minori di età causate dall’emergenza sanitaria provocata dalla diffusione del contagio da SARS-CoV-2.

Based on a structured approach to research in the empirical literature, this reasoned overview is dedicated to the consequences produced on the living conditions of minors by the health emergency resulting from the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.. […]

Vita privata e familiare | Private and family life

VANNUCCINI S. – Situazioni di «particolare vulnerabilità» dei minori di età e obblighi di protezione dello Stato: note a margine della sentenza V.C. c. Italia

Autore dell’articolo/Author
Sabrina Vannuccini

Abstract

The case of V.C. v. Italy concerned a person who, as a minor (aged 16 at the time) suffering from psychological disorders, alcohol and drug addiction, had been the victim of a child prostitution ring and gang rape.

She complained that the Italian authorities had not acted with the necessary diligence and had not taken all reasonable and measures to provide timely protection and  to prevent the abuses she suffered, even though they had been aware of her vulnerable situation and the real and immediate risk she faced. […]

Vita privata e familiare | Private and family life

NULLO L. – La Corte EDU condanna l’Italia sul “caso ILVA”. Alla ricerca di un equilibrio tra tutela della salute, rispetto dell’ambiente ed esercizio di attività economiche di interesse nazionale.

Autore dell’articolo/Author
Leonardo Nullo

Abstract

With the judgment Cordella e altri c. Italia, The European Court of Human Rights back to rule on the “ILVA case”, condemning the Italian State for the violation of art. 8 C.E.D.U. (right to private life) because the institutional authorities failed to take the necessary measures to protect the right of those concerned to respect their private lives, on which the polluting emissions of ILVA would have interfered. The ECHR also decides for the violation of the art. 13 C.E.D.U. (right to have an effective remedy), considering that the Italian legal system was devoid of internal remedies by which the inhabitants concerned could have complained about the failure to implement the environmental recovery plan required by the “save-ILVA” decrees and, ultimately, effectively defending against the violation of a right protected by the European Convention. […]

Con la sentenza Cordella e altri c. Italia , la Corte Europea dei Diritti dell’Uomo si è pronunciata sul noto “caso Ilva”, condannando lo Stato italiano per violazione dell’art. 8 C.E.D.U. (diritto al rispetto della vita privata e familiare), in quanto le autorità istituzionali avrebbero omesso di adottare quelle misure necessarie per proteggere il diritto degli interessati al rispetto delle loro vite private, sulle quali avrebbero interferito le emissioni inquinanti dell’acciaieria ionica. Il decidente europeo ha altresì ravvisato la violazione dell’art. 13 C.E.D.U. (diritto a un ricorso effettivo), ritenendo che l’ordinamento italiano fosse inoltre privo di vie di ricorso interne per mezzo delle quali gli abitanti interessati avrebbero potuto lamentare la mancata attuazione del piano di risanamento ambientale previsto dai decreti “salva-Ilva” e, in definitiva, difendersi in modo effettivo a fronte della violazione di un diritto sancito dalla Convenzione.
Pur a fronte di tali constatazioni, tuttavia, alle vittime non è stato accordato alcun risarcimento, in quanto la Corte EDU, come in altre occasioni , ha ritenuto che l’accertamento delle violazioni costituisse una riparazione sufficiente per il danno morale subito (§ 187). […]

Vita privata e familiare | Private and family life

VANNUCCINI S. – Diacronia dello sviluppo giurisprudenziale e legislativo della disciplina sul parto anonimo e sulla conoscenza dei propri veri natali

Autore dell’articolo/Author
Sabrina Vannuccini

Abstract

This paper deals with the interaction of two potentially competing rights, and the ways in which they can be balanced against each other: the right of the mother to remain anonymous after giving birth, without recording her name on the child’s birth certificate, and the right of the newborn to know his/her parentage, i.e. his/her biological family, ascendance and conditions of birth, as an integral part of the right to an identity.
The evolution of the regulation of anonymous birth – from the blind preference to the person who wishes to keep her identity secret (with the consequence that the right of the person abandoned at birth to find his/her origins is entirely neglected and forgotten) to the recognition that the problematic issue does not lie in the mother’s right to anonymity per se, but rather in its irreversible nature, and to the progress on the implementation of the child’s right to knowledge of his/her personal history (and similar right to knowledge on the side of the mother who desires to initiate a search for her child) – is studied through a diachronic analysis of the judicial and legislative development on this matter in the Italian Legal System.
.[…]

Vita umana | Human Life

VANNUCCINI S. – «Memento mori» («secundum voluntatem medicorum et sententiam iudicum»). Il caso francese di Vincent Lambert

Autore dell’articolo/Author
Sabrina Vannuccini

Abstract

The case of Vincent Lambert refers to the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration of a French patient in a state characterized as «minimally conscious plus», according to the decision taken by the doctors in charge of him, first confirmed by the Conseil d’État and then by the ECtHR, but in the absence both of advance directives drawn up by the patient and of a person of trust within the meaning of the relevant provisions of the Public Health Code, and also with the opposite opinion of his parents and other family members.
This case is not only a patient’s case, but also a question about the death, that of a young man in the incapacity to express its will. This case, and the questionable national and European rulings, reopen a debate never ceased in France, as in Europe as a whole, about the rights of patients and their representatives, the duties of care and assistance, the distinction between treatments and vital treatments, the full protection of human frailty, the unavailability of one’s own bodily life.[…]

Accessibility